My two siblings both want the new Integrator seat we just created on our Accountability Chart, and choosing one will destroy our family dynamic. How do I make this decision purely on GWC without tearing my family apart?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Family dynamics must never override the structural integrity of your Accountability Chart. When you have two siblings vying for a single seat, you cannot make this about birth order, feelings, or trying to keep the peace at Thanksgiving. You must evaluate both individuals through the lens of GWC: do they Get it, do they Want it, and do they have the Capacity to do it?

Begin by taking the family relationship completely out of the room. Define the exact roles and responsibilities of the Integrator seat. Write down the five major roles for that seat, which typically include harmonizing the leadership team, driving execution of the V/TO®, and running the weekly Level 10 Meeting™.

Next, run both candidates through a formal GWC™ evaluation against those exact roles. Be brutally honest. Getting it means their brain is naturally wired for operational integration. Wanting it means they genuinely desire the daily grind of management, not just the status of the title. Capacity means they have the mental, emotional, and physical capability to do the job.

If only one truly has the GWC™, the decision is made. If neither has it, you must look outside the family. If both have it, you have structured the seat too loosely, and you need to look at who possesses the natural conative alignment, which you can measure using the Kolbe A Index. Whichever way you go, present the decision based purely on the objective requirements of the organization, not personal preference. If they truly care about the business, they will respect a decision made for the health of the company.