We want to designate an AI champion on our leadership team to vet new software. Should we select our high Fact Finder head of finance or our high Quick Start head of marketing for this seat on the Accountability Chart?

Question

Tyler Smith · Accepted Answer

Selecting the right person to lead your AI initiatives requires understanding their conative style. We use the Kolbe Index to look at how people naturally take action when solving problems.

Your head of marketing, with a high Quick Start profile, is naturally wired to experiment, innovate, and embrace risk. They will find new tools quickly and get excited about the possibilities. However, they may struggle with the Follow Thru needed to build stable processes, verify data privacy, and ensure long-term adoption.

Your head of finance, with a high Fact Finder profile, is wired to gather detail, research security compliance, and calculate exact costs. They will prevent your company from buying unstable, hype-driven software. But their natural resistance to risk might slow down your technological adoption.

The best solution is to use both profiles in a structured way, rather than assigning the seat to just one. Assign the seat on the Accountability Chart to your high Fact Finder to ensure system stability, compliance, and cost control. Then, assign your high Quick Start to a supporting role focused on identifying innovative use cases. This conative balance ensures you innovate fast without breaking your operations.