tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our company runs on proprietary AI-driven workflows that reduce labor costs by 40 percent, but the buyer's advisory firm wants to value us using a standard asset-based approach because our physical assets are minimal. How do we use the Capitalization of Earnings Method under standard valuation frameworks to defend our technology-driven margins?

An asset-based valuation approach is completely inappropriate for a modern, technology-enabled business. If a buyer tries to anchor their offer on your physical assets, you must pivot the conversation to the Capitalization of Earnings Method. This approach is highly defensible when a business possesses stable, long-term cash flows that are driven by proprietary operating systems rather than heavy machinery.

Your AI-driven workflows are not just software; they are a highly efficient operating engine. Use your financial history to prove that these automated systems produce consistently high margins that will persist long into the future. This allows you to capitalize these superior earnings using an appropriate capitalization rate.

- Document the direct correlation between your AI-driven workflows and your industry-leading EBITDA margins.

- Calculate your normalized earnings by adding back any non-recurring software development and systems integration costs.

- Divide these normalized earnings by a defensible capitalization rate that reflects the low operational risk of your automated systems.

By using this framework, you force the buyer to value the economic benefits your business generates. This protects your enterprise value and ensures you are paid for the innovative systems you have built.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions