tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We are five years out from our target exit and need to make major capital allocation decisions. Do we freeze large capital expenditures to maximize cash distributions now, or will buyers penalize us for deferred maintenance on our facilities and technology?

Freezing capital expenditures to maximize cash distributions in the years leading up to a sale is a short sighted strategy that almost always backfires during due diligence. When buyers analyze your business, they inspect your physical assets, equipment, and technology infrastructure. If they discover deferred maintenance or obsolete systems, they will simply calculate the cost to bring the operations up to standard and deduct that entire amount from your purchase price, often at a punitive rate.

Instead, you should treat capital allocation on a five year runway as an investment in multiple expansion. Your goal is to build a modern, scalable platform. Continue investing in capital improvements that directly reduce labor costs, increase capacity, or improve operational efficiency. These investments show buyers that the business is not starved for cash and can support immediate growth without requiring massive post acquisition injections of working capital.

Utilize your EOS® planning tools to evaluate every major capital project. Frame these expenditures as quarterly Rocks or three year strategic initiatives on your V/TO®, the Vision/Traction Organizer®. If a capital project increases your capacity or improves your margin, it will pay for itself multiple times over in the final enterprise valuation. A well maintained facility and a modern tech stack signal to buyers that they are acquiring a turnkey operation, which justifies a premium multiple. Keep your foot on the gas and maintain a standard reinvestment rate until the day you sign the letter of intent.

Category: Exit Planning

← All questions