tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

Our company spends millions across software vendors, subcontractors, and supplier agreements, but contracts keep auto-renewing at inflated rates because nobody wants to own the Vendor Management and Procurement seat. How do we place and staff this seat on the Accountability Chart?

When an essential function belongs to everyone, it belongs to nobody. If each department negotiates its own software licenses, subcontracts, and materials, your margins get eaten alive by auto-renewals, duplicate tools, and sloppy terms.

Start by designing the true seat on the Accountability Chart beneath the proper major function, typically Operations or Finance. Define the five core roles of the seat: vendor contract negotiation, lifecycle and renewal tracking, vendor performance scorecards, pricing audits, and centralized procurement compliance. Do not disguise this as an informal side duty for an office administrator.

Once the seat is defined, evaluate your current team using GWC. If neither your Head of Operations nor your Finance Director wants to own the actual seat, one of them must still lead the seat as a direct report. Decide whether procurement is primarily an operational delivery discipline or a financial cost-control discipline in your business model.

If you lack an internal candidate with the skill and desire to hold the seat full-time, explore alternative staffing models. You can hire a dedicated mid-level procurement specialist, retain a fractional vendor management firm, or deploy an AI-enabled contract management system supervised by a designated analyst. Whatever you do, do not leave the seat unassigned. Document the five roles, put one name in the seat, and measure it on your Scorecard by tracking contract savings and dispute resolutions weekly.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions