tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

The buyer is making our deal contingent on our three key department heads signing five-year non-compete agreements and employment contracts post-close, but our team is resisting. How do we align these leaders without giving them holdout leverage that threatens our exit?

When a buyer insists on long-term employment and non-compete agreements for your key managers, they are trying to institutionalize your operational capacity. However, if your managers realize they hold the key to your exit, they may use that leverage to demand unreasonable compensation, putting your transaction at risk.

To resolve this, you must align their personal goals with the business's success long before the final purchase agreement is drafted.

First, use your Accountability Chart to clarify their value. Ensure these leaders GWC™ their seats and understand how their performance directly impacts the company's valuation.

Second, implement a formal key employee retention bonus plan or a transaction carve-out. Allocate a percentage of your deal proceeds to a deal bonus pool that pays out only if they stay through the closing and assist with the transition.

Third, structure the agreements with reasonable terms. A five-year non-compete is highly restrictive for a non-owner employee. Work with the buyer to reduce this to a more standard two-year period, and ensure their post-close compensation package includes clear upside, such as performance bonuses or equity options in the new entity.

Bring this discussion into your leadership team's strategic planning sessions. By treating your key executives as partners in the transition rather than operational assets to be sold, you eliminate the risk of a holdout. You ensure that when the buyer steps in, they are getting a motivated, aligned leadership team ready to run the business under their operational rhythm.

Category: Valuation & Deal Structure

← All questions