tyler-smith.com · Questions & Answers

We plan to sell our business in twenty-four months, and our advisory board says we need a dedicated Risk and Compliance seat on our Accountability Chart to satisfy institutional buyers, but we cannot afford to hire a full-time Chief Compliance Officer. How do we structure this?

Institutional buyers will heavily discount your valuation or walk away entirely if they detect unmanaged compliance or regulatory risks. You do not need to hire an expensive, full-time executive to solve this. You must design the seat on your Accountability Chart first, regardless of who will fill it. Define the five major roles for the Risk and Compliance seat, such as regulatory auditing, data privacy compliance, contract review, and risk mitigation. Once the seat is cleanly structured, you can fill it fractionally or through a dual-hatting strategy. If you choose to dual-hat, look at your current leadership team. Who has the highest Fact Finder and Follow Thru scores on the Kolbe Index? This person has the natural conative drive to scrutinize details and maintain strict adherence to rules. You can temporarily place their name in the Risk and Compliance seat alongside their primary seat. However, you must ensure they have the actual physical capacity to manage both. If they do not, outsource the actual execution to a specialized compliance firm, and have your internal seat holder act as the accountable manager who owns the relationship and reports the compliance metrics during your weekly Level 10 Meeting. This proves to buyers that compliance is a managed system, not an afterthought.

Category: Accountability Chart & Seats

← All questions